<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bunnika&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='bunnika.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="bunnika&#039;s blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;But But But&#8230;LESBIANS!&#8221;: Debunking a Few More Mansplaining Favorites</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/but-but-but-lesbians/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/but-but-but-lesbians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was so much fun the last time that I immediately got myself in gear for Round 2! So here are a few more arguments presented by our favorite ignorant misogynists, the mansplainers, and the logical deconstruction of their faulty &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/but-but-but-lesbians/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=268&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">It was <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/grade-school-logic/">so much fun the last time</a> that I immediately got myself in gear for Round 2!  So here are a few more arguments presented by our favorite ignorant misogynists, the mansplainers, and the logical deconstruction of their faulty positions.  <i>I&#8217;m talking to you, bro!</i></p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;But I love women!&#8221;</big></p>
<p>This defense is based on the assumption that you can&#8217;t possibly hurt someone you love, a theory that would render family counselling utterly obsolete, and would cause musicians and poets a serious inspirational crisis.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> You&#8217;re being a misogynist.  [Thing that you did] was actively oppressive to me/women at large.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> I have a [wife/daughter/sister/mother]!  I can&#8217;t be a misogynist, because I care about them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Caring about <b>specific</b> women in <b>specific</b> ways does not mean that you &#8220;care about women.&#8221;  And even caring about women as a whole&#8211;being a &#8220;male feminist&#8221;&#8211;<a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/on-unicorns-and-cleaning-the-stable/">does not mean that you are automatically innocent of demonstrating misogyny</a>.</p>
<p>The problem here is that you can hope that awful things don&#8217;t happen to women while still <a href="http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/">actively contributing</a> to the oppression that directly results in those bad things happening to them.  Your wife/daughter/sister/mother was raped, and you&#8217;re furious about that?  Well, the contributions you&#8217;ve made to <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/10/rape-culture-101.html">rape culture</a> helped mold the society that allowed that violation to happen.  And the contributions you continue to make are helping ensure that she doesn&#8217;t get justice.  That&#8217;s an ugly, harsh reality to confront, to acknowledge, but you know what&#8217;s worse?  Being that wife/daughter/sister/mother who was raped, and having to live every day with that injustice.</p>
<p>This is one of those arguments that makes female experiences all about the men who witness them, rather than the women who actually experience them.  There are few things more infuriating than having our experiences appropriated by men to justify further oppressing us.  If, at any point in feminist discussion, you find yourself thinking about the violation/injustice suffered by a woman you love, remind yourself that it should serve to inspire you to argue in favor of justice for all women, not used to silence other women like her.</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;I knew this woman this one time&#8230;&#8221;</big></p>
<p>One of the biggest obstacles when trying to get misogynists to take us seriously is convincing them that feminists are not the evil beasts MRAs have made us out to be.  Our ranks are not thick with false victims demanding prosecution for nonexistent rapes, we do not go about demanding the immediate extermination of men, and we do not hit the abortion clinic every month during our reproductive years because we&#8217;re just so fond of uterine scraping.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> [Issue] is a serious feminist concern, and misogynists/MRAs at best exaggerate and at worst completely invent their &#8216;statistics&#8217; about how it isn&#8217;t.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> Not true!  I once knew a woman who did exactly what the misogynists/MRAs say women do, and her lie proves that feminists are creating misogyny where there is none.</p></blockquote>
<p>Will someone please explain to me exactly when omniscience was granted to the conveyer of such a yarn that allows him to know that the story he heard is 100% accurate?  The mansplainers making this argument rarely have sources (and if they do, almost never legitimate, impartial ones) to prove any of their claims.  It&#8217;s a case of their cousin&#8217;s uncle&#8217;s friend&#8217;s wife&#8217;s veterinarian&#8217;s cosmetologist hearing about how this totally happened this one time, and hearsay is completely legitimate if it supports a patriarchal argument.</p>
<p>Look, even if this was something that you could objectively prove, that one-in-a-million happenstance does not disprove or delegitimize any of the realities of feminist argument.  For example, why, in a world where <a href="http://www.rwu.edu/campus-life/health-counseling/counseling-center/sexual-assault/rape-myths-and-fac">a disturbingly large percentage of men are rapists</a>, do men endlessly complain about how they are &#8220;unfairly villainized,&#8221; while <a href="http://www2.rwu.edu/studentlife/studentservices/counselingcenter/sexualassault/rapemyths.htm">a much smaller proportion</a> of women claiming rape in an unprovable (yet not necessarily invented) case are enough to tear down the entire cause?  Hypocrisy, thy name is &#8220;mansplainer.&#8221;</p>
<p>And delving deeper into the philosophical side of this argument, knowing one actual man-hater does not give you the right to condemn all women.  Personally, I give about as much of a shit about your outrage regarding the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto"><i>SCUM Manifesto</i></a> as I do that of Georgian England over Jonathan Swift&#8217;s suggestion of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal">nomming on infants</a>.  Stop creating <a href="http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-straw-feminist.htm">straw feminists</a> and try actually engaging your mind with the words of the feminists right in front of you, presenting you with legitimate arguments.</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;But but but&#8230;LESBIANS!&#8221;</big></p>
<p>Worried that a woman is making a legitimate objection about <a href="http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/faq-what-is-the-%E2%80%9Cmale-gaze%E2%80%9D/">the male gaze</a> and how women are sexually objectified disproportionately to men because of misogyny?  No problem!  Simply remind us that lesbians find women sexually attractive, therefore the sexual objectification of women cannot be a male or patriarchal creation.  Ooh, and I&#8217;m pretty sure you get some sort of MRA bonus points if you accuse us of being homophobic for &#8220;ignoring lesbians&#8221; in our objection to your misogyny.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> It&#8217;s really gross how [subculture] is objectifying women.  It&#8217;s offensive and pointedly ignores the women within [subculture].<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> Nuh-UH. I totally know <i>women</i> who are attracted to the women who are objectified within [subculture].  Women objectify each other just as badly as men do, you&#8217;re ignoring queer women.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, let me tell you, this is one of my personal favorites, because as a queer woman, I find myself <b>constantly</b> forgetting that I exist.  What on earth would I do without you (almost always straight) men to explain me to myself?  You men do so much for us that we just never give you credit for!</p>
<p>Dripping sarcasm aside, this is really just ludicrous, and you should feel embarrassed for having suggested it.  First, what queer-loving society have we suddenly been transported to where <b>lesbians</b> are the ones being catered to?  <a href="http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/03/21/faq-isnt-the-patriarchy-just-some-conspiracy-theory-that-blames-all-men-even-decent-men-for-womens-woes/">The patriarchy</a> caters to men, period, and the suggestion that it&#8217;s not only catering to women (an oppressed class) but to <b>gay</b> women (who are really winning the oppression lottery here) is so fucking ridiculous that I&#8217;m honestly left balking when this comes up.  This argument is bad, and you should feel bad.</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;Yes, but really, what about teh menz?&#8221;</big></p>
<p>The true cornerstone of any mansplainer&#8217;s philosphy!</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> I dislike how few women are included in [activity], and I&#8217;m not comfortable supporting something so skewed in the favor of men.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> So what, you&#8217;d have men lose their place in [activity] just so women will have equal representation?  We have to think foremost about all those men who are losing their place!  What you&#8217;re promoting isn&#8217;t equality, it&#8217;s misandry, and you just have an agenda.</p></blockquote>
<p>First of all, never, ever respond to a woman&#8217;s legitimate feminist objection with, <a href="http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2011/12/29/why-yes-but-is-the-wrong-response-to-misogyny/">&#8220;Yes, but&#8230;.&#8221;</a>  Just don&#8217;t do it.  You will always, without fail, look like a giant ass.  No, strike that: You will always, without fail, <b>be</b> a giant ass.  You need to stop making everything about <b>you</b>.  Society already makes everything about men; that effort and its effect are the entire basis of patriarchal control.  Please take a break from that self-indulgence to contemplate the other half of the population, represented in this instance by the woman directly engaging you in conversation and asking you to consider that maybe desiring equal representation is not such a wild idea.</p>
<p>Look, here&#8217;s a little fact that most men seem to want to ignore: Feminists know that men suffer from oppression.  Funny thing is, the oppression that men suffer from is misogyny.  The patriarchy <b>does</b> hurt men, and we know that&#8230;but for the love of Ceiling Cat, we need to be allowed debates where that doesn&#8217;t take over the floor, debates where it doesn&#8217;t even come up, because it&#8217;s not relevant.  And the sort of crying about the poor men that you do in this blatant fear-mongering about how feminism is destroying men?  Yeah, you can go ahead and tuck that away in your mental files of <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/">&#8220;Shit That&#8217;s Patently Wrong and I Need to Stop Bringing Up.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>And of course we have an agenda.  Our agenda is to try and turn selfish mansplainers into decent human beings.  Our agenda is to get everyone to treat women as equals to men.  Our agenda is to make a female voice heard amidst the testicular din, to eventually make all female voices heard equal to those of men.  The mansplainers have an agenda, too&#8211;maintaining the status quo, thus keeping women from achieving equality.  Now really, which agenda should we be condemning?  Which side of this debate do you really want to fall on?</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/268/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=268&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/but-but-but-lesbians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grade-School Logic: Debunking a Few Mansplaining Favorites</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/grade-school-logic/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/grade-school-logic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is going to be the first part of at least two entries on what basically boils down to the derailing techniques I most frequently encounter in feminist debate, and why they need to be brought to a screeching &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/grade-school-logic/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=248&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">This post is going to be the first part of at least two entries on what basically boils down to the <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/">derailing</a> techniques I most frequently encounter in feminist debate, and why they need to be brought to a screeching halt.  Many of these are easily applied to any privileged person &#8216;splaining away to any marginalized group, so it is valuable to recognize that as you read through.  Still, since misogyny is the oppression that most actively affects my life, and because I don&#8217;t think it is my place to talk for marginalized groups I am not a part of, I&#8217;ve decided to focus on how men do this in discussions of misogyny.  I&#8217;m addressing this to you mansplainers out there, specifically those of you who think you never mansplain, so listen up, okay?</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;I know you are, but what am I?&#8221;</big></p>
<p>When faced with a reasonable feminist holding up reasonable arguments, there&#8217;s only really one solid place to find refuge: The rubber-and-glue approach.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> You&#8217;re being a misogynist.  Here is how the things you&#8217;ve said/done are misogynistic, and how they negatively affect me and all women.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> You&#8217;re just a man-hater.<br />
<b>WOMAN:</b> This isn&#8217;t about <b>me</b>, it&#8217;s about <b>you</b> and how you&#8217;re being a misogynist.  How I feel about men doesn&#8217;t influence the reality of what I and other women go through, or how you&#8217;re oppressing us.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> Nothing you say has value because it&#8217;s all based on your misandry, and that invalidates all of your experiences and arguments.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s the perfect trap.  A woman is asking you to recognize how you are contributing outright to her oppression, she is asking you to acknowledge how you are demonstrating disrespect, derision, and maybe outright hatred of women.  The best possible response?  To plug your ears and shout about how you don&#8217;t have to listen to the big meanie-head woman with her big meanie-head objections, because you&#8217;ve made a judgment call about her that doesn&#8217;t actually influence anything, except your self-righteousness as you declare yourself above the conversation at hand.  This is usually best handled with a good dose of <a href="http://abagond.wordpress.com/2010/07/24/the-tone-argument/">the tone argument</a>.</p>
<p>This is virtually the definition of derailing.  The conversation is making you uncomfortable, so rather than actually deal with the issues put forth within it, you find a reason to completely ignore it.  You don&#8217;t even need to use a reason in any way related to the subject at hand, you can just toss out your impressions of the speaker and declare that it invalidates everything they do.  This is the same logic that had Republicans swearing Bill Clinton was a horrible president.  It didn&#8217;t matter that <a href="http://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/Accomplishments/eightyears-01.html">he&#8217;d changed a record national debt into a record national surplus, nearly halved the rate of unemployment, and left Americans in the best financial position we&#8217;d been in for decades</a>, he was still deemed a failure <i>as a president</i> because of his sexual activities.  Critics took something that had absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand, and used it to dismiss all of his very valid accomplishments.  This is what you do when you take a conversation about the realities of misogyny and turn it into a huffy judgment call on the speaker&#8217;s perceived hatred for men.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if a feminist hates men&#8211;we&#8217;re desperately asking you to <i>stop making it all about men for once</i>.  <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/sorry-men-you-are-not-oppressed-the-magical-mysteries-of-misandry/">We don&#8217;t have the power to oppress you</a>, therefore our hatred or lack thereof is in no way relevant to the topic of oppression.</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;I don&#8217;t have to listen to a name-caller.&#8221;</big></p>
<p>If a feminist is actually making cracks in your mansplaining veneer, this approach can usually convince misogynistic onlookers that you&#8217;re taking the high road by ignoring all of her legitimate criticisms.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> You&#8217;re being a misogynist.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> Oh so we&#8217;re just name-calling now?<br />
<b>WOMAN:</b> Calling out prejudice is not &#8220;name calling,&#8221; it&#8217;s acknowledging reality.  If you don&#8217;t want to be called a misogynist, stop being misogynistic.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> I don&#8217;t have to listen to somebody who calls me names.</p></blockquote>
<p>This concept is based foremost on the idea that there is nothing worse than being called prejudiced.  The privileged person is so used to being treated delicately by society that they don&#8217;t acknowledge how painful it is for the marginalized person.  Your pain at being called misogynistic is magically worse than the pain endured by a woman actually suffering at the hands of your misogyny, because you&#8217;ve not been suffering all along.  Your first dose of discomfort takes you utterly by surprise, and thus knocks the wind out of you, and convinces you that no one else&#8217;s pain could possibly be so excruciating.  But really, it&#8217;s like telling someone who suffers from fibromyalgia that they really need to stop complaining about pain, when you&#8217;ve got this agonizing splinter in your toe.  You can pull out the splinter, you have control over your pain, you can fix its cause by simply ceasing misogynistic behavior.  We have no such luxury, and to be quite honest, our pain was a hell of a lot worse to start.</p>
<p>And seriously, stop it with that <a href="http://youtu.be/b0Ti-gkJiXc">Jay Smooth video</a>.  Personally, I <b>do</b> tend to follow his model, just because I usually try to be diplomatic, but do you want to know a secret?  You guys almost never care how we phrase it.  If we say, &#8220;What you just said was misogynistic,&#8221; 99% of the time, you&#8217;re going to reply with some form of indignant, &#8220;How <b>dare</b> you call me a misogynist!&#8221;  Demanding this approach as if it would actually make you consider being less of a mansplainer is grasping at straws, trying to excuse your inexcusable behavior.</p>
<p>Justifying prejudice requires some pretty basic failures of both logic and communication, and often, you are so blinded by your privilege that you simply aren&#8217;t paying enough attention.  Marginalized people who fully acknowledge our marginalization tend to be more effective at recognizing subtleties in language, because we&#8217;ve trained ourselves by recognizing the subtleties of our oppression.  One of the biggest benefits of privilege is that it allows you to look at the world through a wide-angle lens, because the little details aren&#8217;t hurtful to you.</p>
<p>And the simple fact of the matter is, after a lifetime of being oppressed by men, we should not have to hold your hands and delicately walk you through the realities of your prejudice.  Take some personal responsibility and <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/google-is-your-friend/">stop making us do all the damn work</a>.</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;<i>I</i> can laugh at your oppression, why can&#8217;t <i>you?&#8221;</i></big></p>
<p>This is pretty much a play on the &#8220;you&#8217;re too serious&#8221; objection.  It&#8217;s often slung about with the insistence that you&#8217;re only laughing <b>ironically</b>, because you recognize how the joke is misogynistic, so it&#8217;s subversive to laugh at it.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>MANSPLAINER:</b> Look at [this blatantly misogynistic thing], isn&#8217;t it hilarious?<br />
<b>WOMAN:</b> Um, no.  It&#8217;s dripping in misogyny, and I don&#8217;t find my oppression funny.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> But that&#8217;s why this is so great!  Think how many people don&#8217;t understand it like I do.  I totally get why it&#8217;s ridiculous, so it&#8217;s alright for me to enjoy it, &#8217;cause I like it ironically!  You should learn to do that.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is nothing &#8220;subversive&#8221; or &#8220;edgy&#8221; about laughing at an old joke.  And that is precisely what every single prejudice-driven attempt at humor is: The oldest joke in the book against the longest-abused victim.  And even if a minority <b>did</b> choose to find some sort of humor in such a thing, that doesn&#8217;t make it automatically acceptable and &#8220;ironic&#8221; for privileged people to laugh.  A minority laughing about their oppression is in no way comparable to a privileged person laughing about how they oppress a minority.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a personal example here: One of my not-so-secret weaknesses is a love of pointless action flicks.  I&#8217;ll happily settle in for a night of popcorn-crunching to machine gun fire in the <i>Rambo</i> movies.  This has shit-all to do with any legitimate feminist objection I make about such films or how they&#8217;re presented and marketed, and does not give you the right to hold my own enjoyment against me, or use it to justify your own prejudice.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing: If women never enjoyed any media that was misogynistic, we&#8217;d be left with almost nothing to watch, read, or listen to.  Yes, misogyny is <b>that</b> heavily ingrained in our culture.  And every feminist has her own tolerance level, and her own guilty pleasures that she indulges in at her own discretion.  <b>None of this</b> invalidates her right to call prejudice out when she sees it, whether it&#8217;s in something she&#8217;d not touch with a ten foot pole, or something she&#8217;d really be able to enjoy more if her favorite genre of movie/style of music/variety of comic book/classification of whatever would treat women with more respect.  On a related note:</p>
<p><big>‣‣‣ &#8220;Flip the feminist switch.&#8221;</big></p>
<p>This is specifically when a man makes a woman feel guilty for having a feminist opinion, like she&#8217;s the wet blanket smothering every bit of fun anyone ever manages to have in the world.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>WOMAN:</b> Yeah, I like [thing], but wish it was a little more inclusive of women.<br />
<b>MANSPLAINER:</b> God, can&#8217;t you ever just <i>turn it off?</i>  We all know you&#8217;re a feminist, but do you have to reply to <i>everything</i> with a feminist critique?  Can&#8217;t you just reply like a normal person for once?</p></blockquote>
<p>Funny, we can&#8217;t just &#8220;turn off&#8221; being female.  We can&#8217;t just flip a switch and magically not be oppressed anymore.  And once we&#8217;ve realized how pervasive misogyny is, how it infects every aspect of our lives, yeah, it can be hard to shelve it and play ignorant for everyone else&#8217;s sake.  And while we may not always have the energy or drive to make such critiques, we are <b>not</b> obligated to stifle them.  Don&#8217;t want to hear feminist objections?  Then work to actively dismantle the patriarchy, so women will have that elusive ~equality~ we&#8217;re always blathering on about and we won&#8217;t have reason to raise feminist objections in the first place.  Problem solved!</p>
<p>So many of these things boil down to a basic objection to male behavior in feminist discussion: You need to stop <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/">thinking that your voice is the one that matters in minority issues</a>.  We hear you, we&#8217;ve been hearing you our entire lives, and society hears you every damn day; that&#8217;s why our oppression still exists.  Now it&#8217;s <b>our</b> turn to be heard, and you need to learn how to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up every now and then.  It won&#8217;t kill you, honest.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/248/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=248&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/grade-school-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Unicorns and Cleaning the Stable: Why Even &#8220;Male Feminists&#8221; Need to Actively Check Their Privilege</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/on-unicorns-and-cleaning-the-stable/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/on-unicorns-and-cleaning-the-stable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 03:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My two most recent posts have both been about the missteps of allies within social justice (specifically, the notion that they deserve equal attention/say in minority issues and on how they damage the cause through privileged platitudes). They&#8217;re both applicable &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/on-unicorns-and-cleaning-the-stable/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=208&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">My two most recent posts have both been about the missteps of allies within social justice (specifically, <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/overstepping-allies/">the notion that they deserve equal attention/say in minority issues</a> and on <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/get-off-the-fucking-fence/">how they damage the cause through privileged platitudes</a>).  They&#8217;re both applicable to most any marginalized group, but this entry I want to specifically aim at &#8220;male feminists,&#8221; and how they contribute to female marginalization.</p>
<p>I moderate an online feminist community, in which I recently shared a blog entry on <a href="http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/">ways that men support rape</a>.  The author states elsewhere that she writes to a radical feminist audience, and thus there are certain assumptions she makes about her readers.  Still, this particular article went a bit viral, and she got a lot of comments from those who do not identify as radical feminists (and perhaps not as feminists at all).  She does a fantastic job of explaining her stance in the comments, and I highly suggest reading them.</p>
<p>One point the author makes in comments is that her list primarily exists as an outline for how men contribute to what many feminists (myself included) refer to as <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/10/rape-culture-101.html">&#8220;rape culture.&#8221;</a>  But she also expresses her distaste for this term, explaining that she &#8220;think[s] [it] is limited, because it removes personal accountability and turns it into something more vague and abstract (&#8216;society&#8217;).&#8221;  It&#8217;s a point I hadn&#8217;t thought much on previously, but I understand her misgivings.  I still plan to continue referring to rape culture, largely out of convenience, as it&#8217;s a term easily understood in feminist circles and, in a way, just makes communication easier.  Still, her comment rung in my brain for a bit, and I&#8217;ve decided that regardless of whether or not I continue to use the term, I also need to start demanding personal accountability from those men who&#8211;regardless of their high-minded intentions&#8211;support the systemic oppression of women.</p>
<p>Part of this determination is because I don&#8217;t think anyone who considers themselves an &#8220;ally&#8221; should allow themselves to become complacent in that role, though many do.  This has proven particularly true in my experience with &#8220;male feminists&#8221;&#8211;they claim the label, they acknowledge that they have male privilege, and so when they subsequently abuse that privilege, they think they deserve just a slap on the wrist, because clearly such a slight isn&#8217;t so bad from a feminist!  They didn&#8217;t intend harm, and we should know that, because they&#8217;re feminists&#8230;right?  But in reality, it&#8217;s simply painful on another level, because those men have, through declaring themselves feminists, lulled us into a false sense of security.  And worse, it sets those men up to shrug off the consequences of their actions more easily, and makes us feel guilty for calling them on their misogyny.</p>
<p>This is a very real problem for a woman in rape recovery, because it cycles back to guilt.  We feel guilty for calling out a &#8220;feminist,&#8221; for insulting an &#8220;ally&#8221; when there are so many Big Bad Rapists and Big Bad Rape Apologists out there who we&#8217;re told <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#moreimportantly">we should be focusing on</a> instead.  And guilt is <a href="http://www.pandys.org/articles/selfblameandsurvivors.html">a very real part</a> of our daily lives, because we have been <a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/rcip/vb.html">guilted by society</a> for our very violations.  We&#8217;re told that our behavior somehow welcomed rape, that we dressed/spoke/acted in such a way that our attacks were our fault.  And no level of academic understanding of how false that is can relieve us of the social pressure to constantly question ourselves.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why this list and its wording are so important, and something that &#8220;male feminists&#8221; in particular need to take a long look at.  Note, this list calls out the actions of <b>rape supporters</b>&#8211;not rapists, not rape apologists.  But what&#8217;s the difference?  Rapist&#8230;that label is pretty obvious.  (Or at least one would hope, though very often <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/12/rapists-who-dont-think-theyre-rapists/">even rapists think they&#8217;ve never raped</a>.)  Rape apologists are those people who make excuses for the rapist, a rape apologist says that women <a href="http://youtu.be/EaEmnizU6tw">&#8220;ask for it&#8221;</a> through dress or behavior, they say <a href="http://www.pandys.org/articles/intimatepartnerrape.html">partner rape</a> isn&#8217;t &#8220;real&#8221; rape, they come up with bullshit excuses for why the very real act of rape wasn&#8217;t <b>actually</b> rape, or why it should be <a href="http://crustyriotgrrl.blogspot.com/2008/11/rape-acceptance-in-college-aged-men.html">accepted</a> anyway.  Rape <b>supporters</b> are those who contribute to rape culture, they are the people who create a society in which rape is normalized, accepted.  A rape supporter can be someone who finds the act of rape absolutely abhorrent, who would never forgive a rapist his actions or a rape apologist their excuses.  But, by contributing to the systemic marginalization of women, a rape supporter helps form the culture that allows those people to do those things, hold those views, and go largely uncondemned by society.  Basically, a rape supporter is a misogynist, because misogyny is the lifeblood of rape culture.</p>
<p>Rape culture isn&#8217;t about a world in which every man actively supports rapists and maybe is a rapist himself, at that.  It&#8217;s about a society where rape is normalized, where the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/4636689/Men-really-do-see-half-naked-women-as-objects-scientists-claim.html">objectification of women</a> is accepted and its <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php">consequences</a> ignored.  Every time a man does something on that list to oppress me and women like me, he is lending direct support to the cultural norms that make my rape acceptable, that prevent me from ever having justice.  He is directly contributing to the social conditioning that has convinced my rapist that he&#8217;s not even a rapist, because I &#8220;deserved&#8221; to be attacked by merit of my behavior.  A man who engages in the items on that list is granting comfort to my rapist, at <b>my</b> expense, because that&#8217;s what rape culture does, and it shouldn&#8217;t have to be something we talk about in theories with platitudes.  I and other women (<b>especially</b> <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/weve_been_violated_enough/">rape survivors</a>) shouldn&#8217;t be required to consider <a href="http://abagond.wordpress.com/2010/07/24/the-tone-argument/">the delicate feelings of men</a> when confronted with their demonstrations of misogyny.  And by objecting, by demanding special consideration for being &#8220;feminists,&#8221; those men are telling us that our victimization matters less than their delicate ally feelings.  When any man engages in the objectification or marginalization of women, they are <b>directly oppressing me</b> by supporting the social constructs that allowed my rape to happen, forced me to stay silent, and will forever deprive me of justice.  Yet I&#8217;m expected to be delicate when confronting them.  The hypocrisy would be laughable if it wasn&#8217;t so damn painful.</p>
<p>The biggest obstacle in tearing down rape culture is that most people do not recognize how they contribute to it.  And while women can certainly engage in <a href="http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/internalized-sexism/">internalized misogyny</a>, women do not have the social power to oppress other women, which is why lists like this focus on <b>men</b>.  It&#8217;s not about how men are the evilest of evil sexes, about how any man who engages in an activity on that list is out to personally destroy women.  It&#8217;s about how without challenging their privilege, and actively rejecting it, men are contributing to our oppression through passive acceptance of it.  And any man who decries this as too harsh a judgment is holding himself to paltry standards.  I believe they can handle challenging their privilege; maybe they should believe so strongly in themselves as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never known a man who did not demonstrate misogyny.  Period.  I believe the truly &#8220;feminist&#8221; man to be a unicorn, that mythical creature whispered about in social justice that everyone&#8217;s heard of but no one&#8217;s ever actually seen and touched.  Can men <b>intend</b> to be feminists, intend to never engage in misogyny?  Of course, but (as always), <a href="http://genderbitch.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/intent-its-fucking-magic/">intent isn&#8217;t magic</a>, and privilege is a subversive beast, quick to convince its host that they&#8217;re being completely reasonable and fair, and not marginalizing anyone at all, even if a minority objects to their behavior.  It&#8217;s why I suggest that men who self-identify as feminists take a step back and reevaluate their own actions.  It&#8217;s not about your intentions, your beliefs in equality, your moral code or dedication; it&#8217;s about how insidious privilege is, and how easy it is to succumb to prejudice without even realizing it.  It&#8217;s about me, as a woman, asking you, my &#8220;ally,&#8221; to accept that you <b>will</b> fuck up, that you <b>will</b> demonstrate privilege, and that you <b>will</b> contribute to my oppression, or outright oppress me.  It doesn&#8217;t mean I think you&#8217;re a bad person, and it&#8217;s not about me or other women being <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/">&#8220;man-haters.&#8221;</a>  It&#8217;s about you recognizing your own humanity, and therefore your own fallibility.</p>
<p>Now, I will reiterate, none of this means that I think all men are irredeemable.  I can read through that list with specific men in mind, men whom I love, and recognize ways that they do or have in the past contributed to rape culture.  But the important part is whether or not they are <b>challenging</b> these actions, if they actively seek to cease privilged behavior, listen to the words of women and rape survivors, and respect our voices as more experienced on the topic of our own marginalization.  A man who throws on a Rosie the Riveter tee shirt while still actively engaging in these activities is allowing his privileged ignorance to continue oppressing women; a man who stops screaming &#8220;I&#8217;M A FEMINIST&#8221; so that he can actually hear the words of women is on the right track.</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;m angry.  Actually, I am <b>fucking furious</b>.  And I have every reason to be, because I have spent years being silenced.  And as far as my personal perspective goes, any man who can read this and think they have the right to be angry with me over their hurt feelings, rather than being introspective and acknowledging that my pain and frustration are legitimate, that they <b>do</b> fuck up and <b>do</b> oppress me&#8230;well those men can go to hell.  I&#8217;ve had enough of those men in my life, and they do nothing but slow recovery, they do nothing but make me feel selfish because I have the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hR1AotmLMi8RXJgFZev4n7e7qE1g?docId=CNG.051479eb881467a088eb6e97370ff0bc.301">unmitigated gall</a> to be <a href="http://www.aest.org.uk/survivors/rts.html">traumatized</a> by my rape.  So sorry to inconvenience you with my radical feminism, but truly, do you think your discomfort outweighs my own?  Do you think I&#8217;m <a href="http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/the-sad-art-of-gaslighting/">overreacting</a>?  Do you think being accused of misogyny is worse than being the victim of it?  Do you think that being accused of supporting rape is more traumatic and damaging than <b>being raped</b>?</p>
<p>Please do think on that a moment.  Because there is precisely one answer that will make you a decent human being.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/208/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=208&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/on-unicorns-and-cleaning-the-stable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Off the Fucking Fence or Get Out of My Movement: Overstepping Allies Part II</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/get-off-the-fucking-fence/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/get-off-the-fucking-fence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ableism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queer rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Privilege is a nasty, sneaky thing. It&#8217;s easy for most people to go through life pretending they don&#8217;t even have it. And when someone does recognize their privilege, they are invariably met with backlash from other members of their privileged &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/get-off-the-fucking-fence/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=197&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">Privilege is a nasty, sneaky thing.  It&#8217;s <a href="https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#sclient=psy-ab&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;site=webhp&amp;source=hp&amp;q=affirmative+action+is+reverse+racism&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=affirmative+action+is+reverse+racism&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g-v1&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=1279l1279l0l1977l1l1l0l0l0l0l625l625l5-1l1l0&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&amp;fp=a1bc1589ec616832&amp;biw=1399&amp;bih=749">easy</a> for <a href="https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=men's+rights">most</a> <a href="https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;source=hp&amp;q=the+war+on+god&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=the+war+on+god&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g2g-v2&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=9664l12990l3l13238l14l12l0l1l1l0l622l4602l0.1.0.4.3.3l12l0&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&amp;fp=a1bc1589ec616832&amp;biw=1399&amp;bih=749">people</a> to go through life pretending they don&#8217;t even have it.  And when someone <a href="http://kotaku.com/5868595/nerds-and-male-privilege">does recognize their privilege</a>, they are invariably met with backlash from other members of their privileged social groups.  This is because most privileged people are desperate to maintain the status quo&#8211;some obviously, some subtly.</p>
<p>Nearly every human being benefits from some form of privilege, and that privilege swaddles us in a cozy blanket of safety.  It allows us to function in our daily lives with a level of peace that minorities aren&#8217;t allowed.  As a white person, I don&#8217;t need to fear <a href="http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/racial-profiling">targeted police harassment</a>.  As a cis female, I don&#8217;t need to fear violence should I <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2011-04-24/news/bs-md-mcdonalds-beating-20110423_1_transgender-woman-mcdonalds-county-police">need to use a public restroom</a>.  <a href="http://heyfatchick.tumblr.com/post/1296446884">Thin privilege</a> allows me to shop for clothes without being bullied and eat without being guilted.  All privileges have different comforts, but they are all based on the same principle: We are given this comfort because we allow the world to continue making minorities <b>un</b>comfortable.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ve found that the most respectful thing I can do as an ally is to stop calling myself an ally.  Those social justice movements for minorities I&#8217;m not a member of?  <i>They are not about me.</i>  So while I may want to pass on a link that&#8217;s of interest in those movements, or express my support to a friend fighting those battles, it is not my place to <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/overstepping-allies/">declare my word to be as important as those of the minorities involved</a>.  Instead, I stick to the sidelines, I observe, learn, and work to challenge my inherent prejudices.  If a marginalized person tells me my presence is not welcome, that I&#8217;m overstepping or being offensive, I apologize, back away, and allow them the floor.  It&#8217;s their movement, not mine; there is no reason for it to be all about me.</p>
<p>With that as my personal approach, I&#8217;m going to address self-proclaimed &#8220;allies&#8221; within my own social justice movements.  Possibly my biggest pet peeve among such people is when they take it upon themselves to play mediator for my movement.  Facebook is an ideal medium for such infuriating audacity, and frequently, I&#8217;m witness to this same basic scenario:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>ALLY: </b>Look at this article I&#8217;m sharing about feminism/queer rights/*insert social justice movement here*!  I&#8217;m not a member of this minority, but I&#8217;m so happy to see them moving toward equality.<br />
<b>BIGOT: </b>I&#8217;m tired of all this PC garbage!  I will now spew bigoted rhetoric all over your supposedly egalitarian Facebook post!<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON: </b>Hey, Bigot, think you could stop being a bigot and treat me like a human being?<br />
<b>BIGOT: </b>Of course not!  In fact, I will use the <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/">Magic of Derailing</a> to invalidate every logical point you make.  And just for good measure, I&#8217;ll add in some stuff about how you&#8217;re ruining the fabric of society with your mere existence.<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON: </b>You know, I&#8217;m not a fucking theory, I&#8217;m a human being, and I&#8217;d appreciate a little respect.  The least you could do is engage me in legitimate conversation, rather than ignoring all of the sound logic I present and then spouting hateful nonsense.<br />
<b>ALLY: </b>Whoa, whoa, both of you calm down.  Bigot, I agree with Marginalized Person that they should have equal rights, but you make good points about MP being too angry to take seriously.  If we&#8217;re going to have equality, it should be the kind where minorities continue to be told that their opinions on minority issues are less important than or&#8211;at best&#8211;on par with that of their oppressors, even though they&#8217;re the only ones with personal experience on the subject.  Though I&#8217;m an ~ally~ and thus disagree with you as a bigot, I completely respect your right to continue spouting hate in my space, making MP feel unsafe and further marginalized.</p></blockquote>
<p>And you see that?  <i>That&#8217;s when allies stop being allies.</i></p>
<p>So, here is my call-to-arms for anyone who would like to think of themselves as an ally in social justice.  You want to make a difference?  Start lending <b>real support</b> to minorities, and not just the kind that&#8217;ll earn you <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/">ally cookies</a>.  You want to make a difference?  Try going through this checklist before you engage in a conversation about minority rights.  And then, for each point you fail to check off, challenge yourself to do better.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>THE TOP TEN CHECKLIST FOR HOW TO <strike>BE A GOOD ALLY</strike> NOT BE AN ASSHOLE</b></p>
<p>1. I did <b>not</b> tell a marginalized person how they are wrong about their marginalization.</p>
<p>2. I did <b>not</b> actively support another privileged person&#8217;s bigoted words by stating how their bigotry made a good point.</p>
<p>3. I did <b>not</b> state or imply that privileged opinions should be heard and valued equally alongside minority opinions on minority issues.</p>
<p>4. I <b>did</b> defer to minority experiences over my privileged observations.</p>
<p>5. I did <b>not</b> tell a marginalized person that they are being &#8220;too mean&#8221; to a privileged person, or ask them to be less offensive to their oppressors.</p>
<p>6. I did <b>not</b> laugh at a prejudiced joke, or make &#8220;ironic&#8221; use of prejudice to show my superior understanding of the situation and my privileged ability to find humor in oppression.</p>
<p>7. I did <b>not</b> paint a specific marginalized person or any minority as a whole as too extreme, angry, illogical, emotional, or ignorant to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>8. I <b>did</b> ask other privileged people to follow my example in listening to the words of a marginalized person, and to value their experiences as more relevant than our own on the issue of their oppression.</p>
<p>9. I did <b>not</b> contribute to stereotypes about any minority, either actively (&#8220;*minority* is *stereotype*&#8221;) or passively (&#8220;we can&#8217;t ignore that *minority* is statistically more likely to *stereotype*&#8221;).</p>
<p>10. I did <b>not</b> proclaim myself arbiter of minority issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>Privilege is not passive.  Yes, the way it permeates our lives makes it seem that way, and elements of it are particularly subversive.  But all allies need to understand that privilege, by its very nature, is <b>actively</b> oppressing those who lack it.  Privileged people love to wave the flag of free speech in front of dissenting minorities, but it&#8217;s a strawman.  Minorities are not telling privileged people, &#8220;You don&#8217;t have the <b>right</b> to have that opinion,&#8221; we&#8217;re telling them, &#8220;That opinion is bigoted and it hurts me.&#8221;  We&#8217;re not saying, &#8220;You don&#8217;t have the <b>right</b> to say things that oppress me,&#8221; we&#8217;re saying, &#8220;You already oppress me <b>constantly</b>, and you should want to change that.&#8221;  When appealing to the logic of those who call themselves our allies while still falling into bigoted traps like &#8216;splaining away our experiences, we&#8217;re saying, &#8220;You are <b>still</b> oppressing me, and it&#8217;s hurtful that you call yourself my ally while demonstrating that you consider your &#8216;right&#8217; to subtly oppress me more important than my right to be treated as your equal.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are not granted magical insight thanks to your superior logic.  It&#8217;s easy to feel that way, since your life is not invested in the subject, but that lack of emotional investment is because your Degree in Supreme Logic was obtained at the University of Social Privilege.  You have the <b>privilege</b> of looking at things coldly, and all that really gives you is some questionable logical leaps, based entirely upon your assumptions of what it is like to be the minority.  That&#8217;s the thing about <b>real</b> logic that privileged people tend to overlook: You can&#8217;t come to a logical conclusion without all of the facts.  And no matter how many studies you read, or how many Theories of Debate courses you take, you will never have the most basic facts in the movement: The reality of what it is like to live as that minority.</p>
<p>Minority lives are not theories.  Marginalized people are not observed subjects.  And if you want to be an ally, the first step is to acknowledge that all of your booklearnings on what it&#8217;s like for minorities don&#8217;t give you the right to silence our voices.  Your &#8220;logic&#8221;?  It&#8217;s just another way to silence us.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=197&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/22/get-off-the-fucking-fence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overstepping Allies: The False Assumption of Privilege Acknowledged, or &#8220;Let Me Explain Your Oppression to You&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/overstepping-allies/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/overstepping-allies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ableism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queer rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took me a while to truly acknowledge what delicate flowers allies in social justice are. Part of this is attributable to my own ally status, as I&#8217;d run in circles trying to explain how I&#8217;m not racist!, and that &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/overstepping-allies/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=169&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">It took me a while to truly acknowledge what delicate flowers allies in social justice are.  Part of this is attributable to my own ally status, as I&#8217;d run in circles trying to explain how <i>I&#8217;m not racist!</i>, and <i>that comment I made wasn&#8217;t transphobic!</i>, because <i>just look what a good ally I am!</i> and <i>but but but <a href="http://genderbitch.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/intent-its-fucking-magic/">intent</a>!</i>  It&#8217;s a really vicious cycle, and one that even those of us who try very hard to acknowledge our privilege can still stumble over.  But if we want to really start creating equality in this world, all allies need to stop <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/">focusing on how we&#8217;re the bestest best allies in the world and marginalized people just need to let us explain that to them</a>.  We need to actually take a step back when someone says, &#8220;Hey, you&#8217;re exercising your privilege over me.&#8221;  We need to try and have enough empathy and basic human respect to say, &#8220;I&#8217;m not the one who matters here.  Society lets me have my say all the time, that is my privilege, and I need to relinquish it if I really desire equality.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many marginalized people live in constant fear of alienating allies.  We need people to listen to us, to take our plight seriously, so it&#8217;s easy to want to cling to those privileged people who say they understand.  But the problem emerges when that acknowledgement comes with so many privileged strings attached that the oppressed person winds up bound by the threads of their &#8220;ally.&#8221;  It goes something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>ALLY:</b> Hi!  I&#8217;m Whitey McStraightdude, and I agree that I have privilege over you.  I&#8217;m so sorry that Alabaster Heteroman is so mean to you!  It&#8217;s really awful how all those <i>other</i> privileged people oppress you.  In fact, I will now stand here and tell you all of the ways that I respect you and consider you my equal.<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON:</b> Well, thanks Whitey, but since I&#8217;m the oppressed person in a minority space, I&#8217;d like to talk about the prejudices I face.  This isn&#8217;t about you, or what a good ally you are; it&#8217;s about me, and marginalized people like me.<br />
<b>ALLY:</b> Oh of course, but I want to make it clear that I&#8217;m one of the good guys, and I&#8217;m totally on your side.  <i>I</i> would never oppress you.<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON:</b> Uh&#8230;actually, by making the entire dialogue about you and your praise-seeking desire to prove that you&#8217;re a great ally, instead of allowing the discussion to remain strictly about the prejudices I face as a marginalized person, you&#8217;re silencing my voice, and that&#8217;s oppressive.<br />
<b>ALLY:</b> Impossible!  I admit that I have privilege, and thus am incapable of oppressing you, while also setting myself up as completely free of the responsibility to assess my words and actions for prejudice.  By calling myself an ally, I have wrapped myself in an impenetrable force field of my own ignorance and ego!  Now please stop waving about these wild accusations of me <i>oppressing</i> you, that&#8217;s just silliness.<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON:</b> But you&#8217;re not being a good ally if you don&#8217;t listen to the words of the oppressed!<br />
<b>ALLY:</b> Whoa now, you&#8217;re <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#overemotional">getting too emotional</a>, when what you need to do is calm down and recognize that I&#8217;m correct here, because not only do I call myself an ally&#8211;thereby ensuring that everyone respects me as self-aware and a person seeking equality&#8211;but I&#8217;m also the male/white/straight/etc. person here, so society has already informed me that my opinion means more than yours.<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON:</b> What the hell?!  That&#8217;s prejudiced!  <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/weve_been_violated_enough/">The person on the receiving end of prejudice is the one who most deserves to have their voice heard.</a>  You don&#8217;t get to tell me that you know more about my oppression than I do, or that your opinion of it trumps my own!<br />
<b>ALLY:</b> Well now you&#8217;re just being <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#hostile">hostile</a>, and a good ally like me shouldn&#8217;t have to listen to a marginalized person saying I could possibly do anything wrong, ever.<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON:</b> Of course I&#8217;m being hostile!  You&#8217;re ignoring every word I say in favor of your own privileged opinion!  You&#8217;re oppressing me just the same as any other privileged person!<br />
<b>ALLY:</b> No, no, you&#8217;re confused.  Remember, I&#8217;m an <i>ally</i>.  I don&#8217;t oppress you.  You&#8217;re just a fringe lunatic who wants to enact <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/sorry-men-you-are-not-oppressed-the-magical-mysteries-of-misandry/">reverse-prejudice</a> against me because you&#8217;re <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#envy">jealous</a> of my social privilege.  I refuse to listen to such a hysterical argument from someone so prejudiced against me!<br />
<b>MARGINALIZED PERSON:</b> But I have every right to voice my anger and frustration when someone is exercising their privilege over me!  I have every reason to be angry, and you&#8217;re doing nothing but dismissing my words because of some arbitrary standard you set up for how oppressed people should demure to our oppressors, even when talking about our own oppression!<br />
<b>ALLY:</b> Yep, and now that I&#8217;ve properly <a href="http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/the-sad-art-of-gaslighting/">gaslighted</a> you, I&#8217;ve made certain that you appear to the masses as a radical lunatic whose opinions deserve no respect, because even your own allies disagree with you.  You&#8217;ve turned me into a martyr for privileged people, and proven that oppressed minorities are illogical, hateful, unappreciative bullies, and everyone really needs to start having pity for the unfortunate privileged people who have to suffer at the hands of your reverse-prejudice.  That&#8217;s what you get for not showing me the proper gratitude when I pretended to consider you my equal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sound pretty extreme?  Probably.  But it constantly happens within social justice circles, and is made all the worse when marginalized people feed the ally&#8217;s ego.</p>
<p>Sometimes we do it because we&#8217;ve internalized our own oppression so much.  We&#8217;ve been told our entire lives that we aren&#8217;t effective people, because we are inherently less capable than our social &#8220;betters.&#8221;  Women can&#8217;t be expected to enact change, we&#8217;re too weak and emotional for such intense responsibility.  Queer people can&#8217;t be expected to enact change, we&#8217;re too depraved and selfish to understand the consequences of our actions.  Disabled people can&#8217;t be expected to enact change, we are literally less than fully-functional human beings and need to constantly have our hands held.  We&#8217;re all somehow <b>lesser</b> than our oppressors, and if we are forced to enact social change all on our own, we&#8217;ll fail miserably because we&#8217;re just not capable enough by ourselves.  After all, here&#8217;s an ally telling us we&#8217;re wrong&#8211;and they should know, society taught us they&#8217;re always right.</p>
<p>Sometimes we feed an ally&#8217;s ego because of simple fear of alienating them.  It can be exhausting to recognize all the rampant inequality that exists around us, and if we challenge an ally who demonstrates their privilege, we may end up scaring them away, and being forced to bear the burden of our oppression alone.  There&#8217;s comfort in numbers, and sometimes it&#8217;s easier to retreat into the safety of those numbers than it is to step back and risk solitude by standing up for ourselves.</p>
<p>Sometimes it&#8217;s because we don&#8217;t want to be &#8220;one of <i><a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/">those</a></i> marginalized people,&#8221; you know, the crazy extremists that no one likes.  No no, we&#8217;re the <b>logical</b> type, we&#8217;re accessible and fair and really understand that it&#8217;s about <b>equality</b>.  We&#8217;re the fun-loving ones, the ones who can laugh at jokes that are offensive to our minority groups, and eyeroll at the extremists, because it&#8217;s so much easier than living with the daily reality of just how far off we are from equality.</p>
<p>There are a lot of ugly motivations on both sides of the coin, and while minorities need to work to actively challenge our oppression, it&#8217;s unfair that we once again be asked to bear the social burden.  Anyone calling themselves an &#8220;ally&#8221; should constantly be working to recognize the ways in which they feed oppression, and try to <a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/the-male-privilege-checklist/">always</a> <a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/files/mcintosh.html">consider</a> <a href="http://takesupspace.wordpress.com/cis-privilege-checklist/">their</a> <a href="http://sap.mit.edu/content/pdf/able_bodied_privilege.pdf">multitude</a> <a href="http://www.fatshadow.com/October2003.htm#e412">of</a> <a href="http://queersunited.blogspot.com/2008/10/heterosexual-privilege-checklist.html">privileges</a> before speaking out in a minority space.  Remember, demanding that you be respectful and allow minority voices the stage does not necessarily mean that those minorities despise your presence or don&#8217;t appreciate your effort to be a good ally.  At the same time, if a marginalized person <b>does</b> ask a privileged person to sit down and shut up or leave their safe space entirely, it still isn&#8217;t the mystical unicorn of &#8220;reverse-prejudice.&#8221;  It&#8217;s a guttural reaction to desiring one tiny corner of our lives to be safe from privileged voices, well-meaning or not.  Everyone deserves a place where their words can be heard, and privileged people already have that in the greater social sphere.  They need to respect minorities enough to grant us that same freedom in the one tiny arena where we have reason to expect it.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/169/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=169&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/overstepping-allies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re Not Cutting My Sons: Why Infant Male Circumcision is a Feminist Issue</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/youre-not-cutting-my-sons/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/youre-not-cutting-my-sons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 04:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trigger warning: FGM and genital cutting discussed in detail. Some links in this post contain NSFW images. Circumcision is an issue I never invested much thought in before a friend of mine became pregnant with her first son. My child &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/youre-not-cutting-my-sons/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=144&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66"><i>Trigger warning: FGM and genital cutting discussed in detail.  Some links in this post contain NSFW images.</i></p>
<p>Circumcision is an issue I never invested much thought in before a friend of mine became pregnant with her first son.  My child is female, and female circumcision isn&#8217;t just culturally abnormal in America, but also illegal, so it&#8217;s really not an issue that directly impacted my life.  Still, as my friend shared <a href="http://www.circumstitions.com/">intactivist</a> resources, and as I read about the realities of infant male circumcision, I came to realize that this was a human rights issue that really pulled at my heartstrings, and I became committed to the cause.</p>
<p>There are a myriad of reasons why I am passionately anti-circumcision.  It is a <a href="http://www.circumcision.org/response.htm">painful</a>, <a href="http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/pdf/specialstatement.pdf">dangerous</a> procedure that runs the risk of <a href="http://www.fathermag.com/health/circ/horror/horror.shtml">serious complications</a> for the baby.  It causes <a href="http://www.noharmm.org/IDcirc.htm">permanent sexual side effects</a> for males when they reach sexual maturity, including <a href="http://www.drmomma.org/2009/07/sexual-effects-of-circumcision.html">decreased sexual pleasure</a>.  Circumcision is not <a href="http://www.circs.org/index.php/Reviews/Rates/Global">&#8220;normal&#8221;</a> throughout <a href="http://www.malecircumcision.org/publications/documents/HIV_MaleCircumcision_A4_Global_web.pdf">the world</a>, and the derision of intact males can be downright xenophobic.  And when you learn that the so-called &#8220;benefits&#8221; of circumcision&#8211;such as <a href="http://www.circumstitions.com/STDs.html">decreased risk of STDs</a> and <a href="http://www.drmomma.org/2009/09/only-clean-what-is-seen-reversing.html">a &#8220;cleaner&#8221; penis</a>&#8211;are myths, and that even the <a href="http://www.drmomma.org/2010/07/biblical-circumcision-information.html">religious reasons for circumcision</a> have been misrepresented, it seems logically impossible to argue in favor of this elective surgery.</p>
<p>But there is an aspect of intactivism that is largely ignored, and one that is very important to me, as a woman arguing against the forced genital cutting of baby boys: Intactivism is a largely feminist battle, and yet women are constantly facing scorn for taking up the cause.</p>
<p>First, I&#8217;ll approach this from the most obvious standpoint: Biological motherhood.  It is a mother&#8217;s legal right to advocate for the rights of her child, and that includes refusing consent for circumcision.  In cases where custody is legally given to one parent or the other, the custodial parent is allowed to make the decision; for a mother having just birthed her son, the decision falls by default to her.  Motherhood is the only legal parental role immediately determinable upon birth, and a mother has the right to refuse circumcision until/unless the child&#8217;s father proves paternity and has legal custody.  If the mother acknowledges the boy&#8217;s father on the birth certificate, she is legally able to file an injunction against the father to prevent him from having surgery performed on the infant without her consent.</p>
<p>Why might a mother choose to go to such lengths?  Aside from simply desiring what is best for her son, there is another biological factor at play.  A mother who chooses to breastfeed her son <a href="http://www.circumstitions.com/Nursing.html"> will face increased difficulty</a> if he is circumcised.  The pain of the surgery can affect a baby&#8217;s ability to latch, therefore negatively impacting the mother&#8217;s milk supply, and causing difficulties nursing.  Since <a href="http://www.womenshealth.gov/breastfeeding/why-breastfeeding-is-important/">breastfeeding is best for both baby and mother</a>, every woman has the right to advocate for her ability to do so without outside interference.</p>
<p>But even if you adopt your sons, or choose to not have children at all, there are a multitude of reasons why male circumcision affects women, and why we have the right to campaign for male genital integrity.  For one, <a href="http://www.drmomma.org/2009/10/how-male-circumcision-impacts-your-love.html">circumcision decreases not only male pleasure during heterosexual intercourse, but also that of their female partners</a>.  The foreskin increases tactile sensation during sex, and helps provide lubrication which can prevent <a href="http://www.fairview.org/healthlibrary/Article/116680EN">painful vaginal tearing</a>.  Male circumcision causes increased risk of pain and sexual dysfunction in hetero-, bi-, and pansexual women, and that is certainly a matter of feminist concern.</p>
<p>Yet perhaps the most compelling reason for feminists to take up the cause of intactivism is the negative reaction often presented by pro-circumcision males.  We&#8217;re told that we have no place in the discussion, because we do not have penises.  (An especially ignorant response, as most circumcised males arguing this case were circumcised at birth and are equally ignorant to the realities of an intact penis, or were the victims of <a href="http://www.fairview.org/healthlibrary/Article/116680EN">forced retraction</a> before they reached sexual maturity and suffered side effects directly from that violation that taint their own ability to understand how a normal, healthy intact penis works.)  Our concerns are dismissed based entirely upon our sex&#8211;a feminist concern if I&#8217;ve ever heard one.  How can any feminist woman stand by listening to an argument that boils down to, &#8220;I have the penis, I make the decisions&#8221;?  We have every right to stand up for our sons, and we must not let men silence us.</p>
<p>All of this said, there is also a flipside to the movement that I feel the need to address through a feminist lens.  I am troubled by the intactivist use of the term &#8220;Male Genital Mutilation,&#8221; and the constant comparison to Female Genital Mutilation.  I believe circumcision to be amoral and unconstitutional, and I hope for it to someday soon be illegal, but the sweeping comparisons to FGM are outright appropriation.  Yes, male circumcision is analogous to female circumcision (that is, the removal of the foreskin on a male is comparable to the removal of the clitoral hood on a female, though &#8220;female circumcision&#8221; is often used to refer to removal of the entire clitoris; this is why using the terms as direct comparisons without further detail is careless and unwise).  Yet FGM is a term used to describe <a href="http://www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/female-genital-cutting.cfm">an array of horrors</a> that are inflicted upon women and girls which go far beyond circumcision.  For the term &#8220;Male Genital Mutilation&#8221; to be used, the acts would have to be comparable, yet no one is purposefully amputating the glans/head of the penis (FGM can include complete amputation of the clitoris) or amputating the entire shaft of the penis (FGM can include stitching shut the vaginal opening).  This is why feminists balk at the term &#8220;MGM&#8221; to describe male circumcision, and it&#8217;s a fair criticism to make.  Since all cutting of female genitalia is illegal in America, it is of course fair that the same consideration be given to males, but male circumcision simply is not comparable to the dark extent of FGM, and this comparison is used as a scare tactic, and the term used as buzzwords to attract attention.  I far prefer the term &#8220;Male Genital Cutting,&#8221; as it is more accurate, and less inflammatory and offensive to those familiar with the horrors of FGM.</p>
<p>A real problem is that misogyny is rampant within the intactivist movement, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Feminists4GI">even among those who call themselves feminists</a>.  Appropriating the oppression of women to champion your movement is misogynistic, and decrying women who support circumcision as <a href="http://www.foreskin-restoration.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7650">misandrists</a> is ignorant at best.  Mostly, they&#8217;re women who have internalized societal misogyny so strongly that they demure to what the men and &#8220;experts&#8221; in their lives have to say, because surely, us little ladies can&#8217;t be smart enough to make these sorts of decisions for ourselves.  And while internalized misogyny is a frustrating wall to hit, the answer is not to attack those women, call them <a href="http://circleaks.org/index.php?title=Circumfetish">&#8220;circumfetishists&#8221;</a>, and scream about how much they must hate men, and how this &#8220;proves&#8221; that <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/sorry-men-you-are-not-oppressed-the-magical-mysteries-of-misandry/">misandry is real and is a demonstration of how women oppress men</a>.  No.  But the problem is, the real answer has no immediate gratification.  Providing women with resources, information, and facts, all calmly and with a hand out to support them if they need help&#8230;well, that takes a lot more time and effort than it does to call them misandrist sickos and run off for back-pats from your intactivist buddies.  Actually working to tear down the misogyny that prevents mothers from advocating for their sons is too damn hard for most intactivists, and that refusal to do what&#8217;s necessary, that laziness in the face of a true answer, it not only makes the movement inaccessible to the common person, it also makes it unappealing and downright oppressive.  And as much as we should argue tooth and nail for the genital integrity of all children, we should not do it at the expense of an oppressed minority.  We should not do it with misogyny.</p>
<p>I have personally championed intactivism, misogyny-free, with great results.  Not everyone&#8217;s mind will change, but I can remain secure in the knowledge that there are people out there in the world, having babies, planning to have babies, some who even had sons they circumcised before we met, who have now decided to not circumcise any future sons, simply because of the facts I calmly and fairly presented to them.  It&#8217;s not the flashy approach, but in an issue so steeped in female oppression, we are best to tread lightly, lest we win one battle while losing another war.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/144/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=144&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/youre-not-cutting-my-sons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Get Over It&#8221;: Bootstrapping and How Privileged Folks Can Add Ableism to Any Oppression</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/get-over-it/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/get-over-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ableism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve likely heard the phrase &#8220;pick yourself up by your bootstraps&#8221; at some point over the years. It&#8217;s a common colloquialism used to describe finding your way out of a difficult situation by sheer force of will. Unfortunately, what some &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/get-over-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=147&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">You&#8217;ve likely heard the phrase &#8220;pick yourself up by your bootstraps&#8221; at some point over the years.  It&#8217;s a common colloquialism used to describe finding your way out of a difficult situation by sheer force of will.  Unfortunately, what some mean as an inspirational term to describe one&#8217;s ability to self-motivate, others use as a weapon to tear down those who don&#8217;t display such abilities.</p>
<p>In social justice circles, this has morphed into a verb as the act of &#8220;bootstrapping.&#8221;  It&#8217;s common in disability discussion, as many able-bodied people think everyone should be able to bootstrap their way out of anything.  Exhausted from the unending muscle pain of an invisible illness?  Bootstraps!  Just start walking 10 miles to work every day, uphill both ways, and you&#8217;ll learn that your pain is all in your head.  Unable to conquer depression without medication?  Bootstraps!  Toss your pills down the sink and just learn to smile at butterflies and fluffy puppies, and all will be right in the world.  Terrified to enter certain social situations because of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder?  Bootstraps!  Run out your front door and hug some strangers, and you&#8217;ll see how you were scared over nothing.</p>
<p>Often, the bootstrapper will offer an &#8220;inspirational&#8221; story of how they suffered from a similar problem, and bootstrapped their way out of it.  They overcame depression by watching Will Ferrel movies, <i>why are you so unwilling to laugh?</i>  They once had a broken ankle and still didn&#8217;t use the electronic wheelchairs at Wal-Mart, <i>why are you enabling your own laziness?</i>  They lost weight by just switching to diet soda, <i>why do you insist on staying fat?</i>  It&#8217;s not actually done from a place of good will, but rather from one that is trying to induce guilt.  If they were legitimately trying to help, they&#8217;d be forced to acknowledge that not everyone has the same abilities to overcome the cards they&#8217;re dealt.  There is nothing wrong with being unable to bootstrap your way over every obstacle you face, and you are no less of a person for needing help.</p>
<p>Bootstrapping ignores the realities of living with <a href="http://www.butyoudontlooksick.com/articles/written-by-christine/the-spoon-theory-written-by-christine-miserandino/">physical</a> and <a href="http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar-advantage/2010/05/pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps-and-other-myths/">mental</a> illnesses.  It demeans the experiences of those people suffering them, and paints them as too lazy or self-indulgent to do what is necessary to reach normalcy.  It&#8217;s another way for the social majority to tell those suffering that they are lesser, another way for them to marginalize them and deride the suffering they face.</p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re lucky enough that you don&#8217;t suffer such illnesses or disabilities, and you fear you may never experience the glory of bootstrapping.  Well, worry not!  For the social majority has discovered a way to inject bootstrapping into their everyday acts of oppression.</p>
<p>I personally encountered a lovely act of bootstrapping on this very blog a couple of days ago, as I was told that while &#8220;[b]eing a rape victim is troubling,&#8221; I need to just &#8220;get over it.&#8221;  Well, isn&#8217;t that lovely.  Time for me to bootstrap my way out of victimhood!</p>
<p>First, such a mindset ignores the reality that social oppression can result in physical and mental consequences that make such bootstrapping arguments flat-out ableist.  Based on my own experiences with rape, sexual assault, and gendered violence at large, I had <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hR1AotmLMi8RXJgFZev4n7e7qE1g?docId=CNG.051479eb881467a088eb6e97370ff0bc.301">an 89.4% chance of suffering a mental disorder</a>.  Excuse me for allowing my PTSD to get in the way of your ableism, dear mansplainers.  And what about the women who are infected with incurable STDs by their rapists?  Who are left pregnant by their rapists?  Who are physically mutilated by their rapists?  There are a slew of potential <b>physical</b> side effects to gendered violence that bootstrappers would have us all ignore, as well.  They&#8217;d rather paint us as bitter old crones, clinging to our victimizations <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#offence">as an excuse to be offended</a></p>
<p>Second, telling us to bootstrap our way out of being angry over the injustices we face is just another way of dismissing our concerns.  It tells us that our plight <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#disbelief">can&#8217;t really be serious</a>, because we could just bootstrap our way out if we tried hard enough.  It paints minorities as the bad guys, <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#enjoyit">clinging to our anger</a> as justification to hate on privileged people.</p>
<p>Third, even if we were capable of bootstrapping our way out of our upset, it would be counter-productive to the cause of equality.  If every minority simply turned the other cheek when they were wronged, how would justice ever be dealt?  If we just bootstrapped our way toward ignorant, half-assed happiness at the expense of reality, how would our experiences be acknowledged, those slights be challenged to not repeat themselves?  Minorities have every right to be angry; <i>we are oppressed</i>, and oppression is damn angering.</p>
<p>Last, it is not your place to tell anyone how &#8220;troubling&#8221; their problems are; only they know the complete realities of their lives.  You cannot know how severe their pain is, how deep-rooted their problems are, how much strength it takes to accomplish anything in their lives.  You cannot compare your situation to theirs, and tell them, &#8220;I overcame your exact problem, so you can, too.&#8221;  No one lives a life identical to another person, and it is a privileged assumption to think otherwise.</p>
<p>Perhaps the social majority could try picking themselves up by their bootstraps, dragging themselves out of the muck of their own self-righteousness, and learning a little compassion.  That is something that <b>can</b> be done by sheer force of will, yet so few are willing to do it.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/147/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=147&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/get-over-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google is Your Friend: Why Minorities Don&#8217;t Want to Educate You on Your Privilege</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/google-is-your-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/google-is-your-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ableism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queer rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a reason that the top two entries on Derailing for Dummies are about &#8220;educating&#8221; privileged people: Because those people think their privilege should also extend to our time, effort, and patience as we hold their hand through the basics &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/google-is-your-friend/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=139&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">There&#8217;s a reason that the top two entries on <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/">Derailing for Dummies</a> are about &#8220;educating&#8221; privileged people: Because those people think their privilege should also extend to our time, effort, and patience as we hold their hand through the basics of social justice.  They believe they are entitled to that from minorities, and why?  Why, when we are already oppressed by them on a daily basis, are we also burdened with the job of explaining our oppression to them?   </p>
<p>Let me directly address the education-demanding privileged folks for a moment, and outline just a few of the reasons why a minority might not want to be your personal tutor in the subject of marginalization:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>1. It is another way for you to shirk responsibility.</b>  By placing the onus on us, you take upon yourself the ability to say that it&#8217;s <i>our</i> fault that you&#8217;re a bigot, because we won&#8217;t help you change.  It shows a complete lack of responsibility for your actions, and is disrespectful and further marginalizing.  If you want to prove that you don&#8217;t see us as lesser than you, prove this by donating <i>your own</i> time to educating yourself, instead of demanding that we sacrifice our time for you.  By demanding that we succumb to your whims, rather than taking responsibility for googling simple phrases like &#8220;what is white privilege?&#8221; you&#8217;re telling us that your time, your effort, is more valuable than ours.</p>
<p><b>2. You are not the first bigot we&#8217;ve encountered.</b>  It takes only minutes for an individual to search information for themselves; it would take us a lifetime if we had to constantly provide that information to every oppressor we encounter.  By being yet another of a long line of privileged people demanding our efforts, you&#8217;re reinforcing the social structure that tells us that our time, our lives should be spent solving the problems of privileged people.  We&#8217;re already told that constantly; it&#8217;s part of what keeps us oppressed.</p>
<p><b>3. When we <i>do</i> make the effort to educate, our attempts are usually disregarded.</b>  There are few things more frustrating than encountering someone who says they &#8220;only want to learn,&#8221; and they want your help, and then having them spit in the face of all the legitimate information you convey.  Most of us have <i>tried</i> to be educators in the past, and that is exactly why we don&#8217;t want to do it anymore.  We&#8217;ve personally encountered how largely fruitless those efforts are.  If you, as a privileged person, don&#8217;t think the subject is worth enough of your effort to wander over to a search engine and educate yourself, 99.99% of the time, you&#8217;re not going to think any of our arguments are worth your effort to legitimately contemplate.  Those who demand to be educated are those who are most averse to actually opening their minds, and we&#8217;ve learned this through harsh trial-and-error.  Those who demand that others must change their minds for them are those who are least willing to have their minds changed at all.</p>
<p><b>4. Educating you on the ways you oppress us can be harmful and triggering to us.</b>  To use a personal example, I am tired of males thinking they can tell me rape isn&#8217;t a feminist issue, then demanding that I educate them on how it is, lest I concede my defeat.  I can blog about my experiences, and it is done during those times when I can distance myself from the reality of them.  But sometimes that cognitive dissonance is not possible, and when I&#8217;m rape triggered, the last thing I want to do is explain to a self-righteous man how damaging the realities of rape and rape culture are to women.  We, the oppressed people, are <i>victims</i>, and <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/weve_been_violated_enough/">victims don&#8217;t owe you an explanation</a> of their victimization.  It&#8217;s disrespectful to demand that someone dredge through all of their personal experiences just because you are too lazy to hit up a search engine.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is Google that complicated?  Fine, <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+is+male+privilege%3F">here, I&#8217;ll help</a>.  You&#8217;re welcome.</p>
<p>The primary criticism of this mindset is that it makes social justice inaccessible to laypeople.  It&#8217;s what makes feminists into <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/">feminazis</a>, makes all activists look angry and unreasonable.  Well, guess what?  We <i>are</i> angry, and we have every right to be.  And <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-hannah-grufferman/does-facebook-condone-a-c_b_926309.html?ir=Technology&amp;ref=fb&amp;src=sp&amp;comm_ref">&#8220;anger is often the first step toward action,&#8221;</a> so I won&#8217;t apologize for it.  If you understood the prejudice and hatred that really exists towards minorities in this world, you&#8217;d be angry, too.  Or at least I dearly hope so, because otherwise, you are truly a lost cause.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/139/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=139&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/google-is-your-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Man-Hating Feminazi: Maintaining Focus while Fighting Ignorant Stereotypes</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Feminazi.&#8221; I&#8217;ll admit it, I&#8217;ve used that word. It was a word I used to separate myself (a &#8220;reasonable equalist&#8221;) from those crazy, extremist feminists who just took the idea too far. Those women didn&#8217;t just want equality, they wanted &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=127&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">&#8220;<a href="http://wikiality.wikia.com/Feminazi">Feminazi</a>.&#8221;  I&#8217;ll admit it, I&#8217;ve used that word.  It was a word I used to separate myself (a &#8220;reasonable equalist&#8221;) from those crazy, extremist feminists who just took the idea too far.  Those women didn&#8217;t just want equality, they wanted dominance, they wanted power at the expense of men, they wanted to tear apart the foundations of our very society with their hatred.</p>
<p>Or, you know, those women were just better-educated in the realities of society than I was.  They weren&#8217;t so busy proving they could be One of the Boys® that they ignored their own oppression by that very boys&#8217; club.  They were smart enough to recognize prejudice when they saw it, and brave enough to call out inequality.</font></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><font face="arial" color="#ffff66"><img src="http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb373/respectallfearbun/feminazi.jpg"><br />
At least we can all take solace in the fact that our detractors don&#8217;t understand plurals and the grammatically correct usage of apostrophes.</font><font face="arial" color="#ffff66"></p>
<p>It can be really painful to recognize that you are contributing to your own oppression.  <a href="http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/internalized-sexism/">Internalized misogyny</a> is a rampant problem in modern society, particularly among those women who embrace misogynistic standards while crowing to the imaginary goddess of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p72UqyVPj54">Girl Power</a>.  It&#8217;s a lot easier to take false pride, to brag about your equality and fortune, than it is to step back and acknowledge that you and your rights are torn down on a daily basis.  Some people seem to believe that marginalized people are exaggerating their oppression, that we all just <a href="http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#enjoyit">enjoy having something to complain about</a>, something to blame our problems on.  But that&#8217;s a naive assumption, particularly in the face of someone like me, someone who spent so many years blindly pretending that their oppression <b>wasn&#8217;t</b> real, because it&#8217;s easier than facing the reality of it.</p>
<p>The sad fact is, this is <b>still</b> a battle I have to regularly fight, though in a form slightly evolved from that I struggled with as a younger woman.  I&#8217;m no longer concerned with placating men, or with assuring everyone that I&#8217;m <a href="http://www.thenewage.co.za/25179-1007-53-%E2%80%98Be_a_woman,_keep_a_balance%E2%80%99">a &#8220;balanced&#8221; woman</a> who maintains feminine standards while pursuing equality.  But I still fall into traps, I&#8217;m still victimized by misogynistic mind games that trick me into abandoning my philosophy in the name of &#8220;proving myself.&#8221;</p>
<p>I try to integrate my activism into not only my daily life, but my personal philosophy.  Equality is not just an academic curiosity for me, it&#8217;s a real-world pursuit that I actively engage on a daily basis.  This means it exists beside and integrated with my other real-world philosophies, including things like my religion, environmentalism, attached parenting, and honest interpersonal relations.  This integration has largely allowed me to examine all those philosophies that are important to me through a more critical, fair, and objective lens, and work to pursue all of my life goals with the frankest approach possible.  But it also creates problems as opponents use those other philosophies against me, as an attack against my feminism.</p>
<p>This is most successfully done through a spiritual approach.  I&#8217;ve recognized in myself such a strong desire to defend my personal faith and spiritual philosophy that it often obscures my attempts at female equality.  The best example of this is when an anti-feminist accuses me of being a &#8220;man-hater.&#8221;</p>
<p>The man-hating stereotype is perhaps the most common falsehood thrown against all feminists.  This is not to say there aren&#8217;t women who stand firm under the feminist flag while also declaring a hatred for males; I&#8217;m not naive, but I also don&#8217;t feel the need to justify such women&#8217;s behavior or beliefs.  Truthfully, while it goes strongly against my own philosophy to maintain such a hatred, I do not condemn those women.  It&#8217;s immensely difficult to acknowledge your constant oppression and not become bitter and angry toward your oppressors, and I refuse to judge a marginalized person for doing so.  But the <a href="http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/03/10/faq-why-do-you-feminists-hate-men/">man-hating stereotype</a> <b>is</b> largely false within the feminist community, and certainly with me in particular.</p>
<p>And this is where my philosophy opens me up to misogynistic attack.  You see, I&#8217;d have to call hatred my greatest spiritual foe.  I have never found a use for it on a personal level, and have instead found it to be detrimental to my attempts at happiness.  Whenever I&#8217;ve indulged in hate, it&#8217;s done nothing but swallow my life and make me entirely miserable.  Moving away from hate, learning to forgive and/or empathize with those who would inspire hatred, is one of my spiritual tenets.  And this makes being accused of hating when I don&#8217;t one of the deepest insults I can have hurled against me.</p>
<p>This works in the favor of anti-feminists by throwing me off-track when engaging in debates on equality.  Call all feminists man-haters and I&#8217;ll become so busy justifying my personal philosophy and defending the virtue of non-hateful feminists that I&#8217;ll get distracted from the true debate.  The fact is, it doesn&#8217;t matter whether or not feminists hate men; even if all of us were the violent, hateful harpies that anti-feminists make us out to be, we still wouldn&#8217;t have the power to use that hate to oppress men, so its real-world consequences are nil when compared to the subtle and blatant misogyny espoused and perpetuated by men.  Essentially, feminist man-hate is an entirely moot point, yet it is the cornerstone of anti-feminism.</p>
<p>There is a delicate line that must be walked by feminists like myself.  I don&#8217;t hate men, and I don&#8217;t want to personally harm those males that I love, but I must acknowledge that for the feminist movement to be successful, <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/08/fun-feminism-women-feminist">we need to stop catering to male allies</a>.  We need to acknowledge that <b>men</b> are not the ones that matter in this, and our energy should not be divided between the sexes.  Why?  Because of the same answer to common anti-feminist questions like, &#8220;Why do you make rape and spousal abuse feminist issues when men get raped and abused, too?&#8221;  Because men are in power.  Men are not the majority of those victimized.  Men dominate politics, economics, social doctrine.  Men are granted an unfair advantage over women, and until that advantage is stripped, until men and women have equal access to power, and equal ability to exercise control over themselves as individuals and over society at large, focusing on men does nothing but prolong inequality.</p>
<p>Picture two children, each with a bowl of jellybeans.  Jimmy has 10, and Sally has 4.  If you want to allow them an equal number, choose the scenario that is the most efficient, logical course of action:<br />
A) Taking 3 jellybeans from Jimmy and giving them to Sally, so they each have 7.<br />
B) Giving Sally 6 jellybeans, so they each have 10.<br />
C) Giving Jimmy 1 jellybean for every 2 given to Sally, until they each have 16.</p>
<p>Option &#8220;C&#8221; takes far more jellybeans than both of the proceeding options, and takes longer to enact.  And both &#8220;B&#8221; and &#8220;C,&#8221; while eventually reaching equality, rely on the assumption that there are extra jellybeans at your disposal.  What if there are no extras, and you&#8217;re forced to only work with the original 14?  &#8220;A&#8221; is the only possible answer.  Yet anyone who&#8217;s ever raised, worked with, or spent time around children knows Jimmy will cry a stream of crocodile tears over his lost jellybeans; Sally, fairness, and sharing be damned.</p>
<p>Now picture those jellybeans as representations of social, economic, and political power.  Should we add extra seats to Congress, and insist that only women be allowed to run for them?  Should we add even <b>more</b> additional seats and demand that women be elected to two-thirds of them?  Or do we create a society where women are equally voted into those seats that already exist?  Where female candidates are allowed the same encouragement in academic pursuits, the same opportunities for political success, the same popular criticisms as their male counterparts?  The answer seems obvious, yet when feminists pursue that obvious solution, we&#8217;re derided as selfish man-haters, out to strip men of their rights while promoting ourselves to the top of the social hierarchy.  Are we forced to take power away from men in order to have some granted to women?  Sometimes, yes.  But that still does not create the grand imbalance that anti-feminists claim to suffer from, because we are still struggling against such massive inequality that the crumbs we manage to nibble are nothing compared to the cookies devoured by the men in power.</p>
<p>Feminism is not about hate, but feminists shouldn&#8217;t have to keep saying that.  We shouldn&#8217;t be forced to spend so much time assuring everyone that we&#8217;re good, honest, equality-driven people that we have less time to devote to actually achieving that equality.  Men at large need to start understanding the simple truth of the privilege they&#8217;re given when they are handed that heavy bowl of jellybeans.  And if male allies want to be appreciated in feminist circles, they need to stop making such a big deal about how wonderful they are for handing over their candy.  The goal is not a world where women are granted male charity, it&#8217;s a world where the treats aren&#8217;t divided unevenly in the first place.  And until that world is a reality, you&#8217;ll have to excuse me for not gushing over the miraculous generosity of males who go so far as to consider the radical notion that I am their peer.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=127&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/the-man-hating-feminazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb373/respectallfearbun/feminazi.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ve Got Some &#8216;Splaining to Do: The Privileged Refusal to STFU</title>
		<link>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bunnika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queer rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bunnika.wordpress.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend recently posted to Facebook a great collection of photos that were gathered immediately after gay marriage was legalized in New York. They were wonderful, heartwarming, and honestly made me cry as I celebrated-by-proxy with these couples as they &#8230; <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=113&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">A friend recently posted to Facebook <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/portraits-of-gay-couples-just-married-in-new-york">a great collection of photos</a> that were gathered immediately after gay marriage was legalized in New York.  They were wonderful, heartwarming, and honestly made me cry as I celebrated-by-proxy with these couples as they enjoyed another great step toward equality in America.  And yet the first comment my friend earned on this uplifting post was pointlessly negative, criticizing the couples for their attire, stating that the couples weren&#8217;t appropriately formal in their choice of dress, and &#8220;some of them look like getting married was just something to do while they were out grabbing a quick lunch.&#8221;  It was an irksome demonstration of classism (not everyone can afford black-tie attire) with possible undertones of homophobia (&#8217;cause aren&#8217;t those gays supposed to know about fashion?) and sexism (those lesbians just don&#8217;t pay proper attention to femininity).  I replied calmly but frankly that this was an event about love and justice, not fashion, and was greeted in return with defensiveness and &#8220;at least my only&#8230;problem with what is going on in these picures is what they are wearing.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then it hit me: I was being <a href="http://globalsociology.com/2011/05/18/privilege-101-straight-splaining/">straightsplained</a> to.</p>
<p>Clearly, I had no right to get my little rainbow undies in a bunch about his objections to an event that had no implications for him as a straight man&#8211;I should just be grateful he wasn&#8217;t waving a &#8220;<a href="http://www.godhatesfags.com/">GOD HATES FAGS</a>&#8221; sign.  This decision that greatly impacted the members of my social group, my community, totally warranted his unrelated complaints because he, as a straight person, decided it was so.  I&#8217;d totally forgotten that it&#8217;s my responsibility as a queer person celebrating a queer victory to take a step back and kiss the feet of every straight person who doesn&#8217;t consciously forbid me and other queer folks from enjoying such brief glimpses of equality.</p>
<p>Oh, hang on a moment&#8211;I think my Ally Cookies are ready!</font></p>
<p><img src="http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb373/respectallfearbun/rainbowcookies.jpg"><br />
<font face="arial" color="#ffff66">Bon appetit.</font></p>
<p><font face="arial" color="#ffff66">This fallacy is pretty common among those who consider themselves allies to marginalized people in social justice.  I&#8217;m certainly not immune to it, and sometimes I need to take a step back and check my own privileges in discussions of <a href="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/files/mcintosh.html">race relations</a> or <a href="http://queersunited.blogspot.com/2008/08/cisgender-privilege-checklist.html">transgender issues</a>, for example.  But commonality does not make it acceptable.  One of the most important things you must keep at the forefront of your mind as an ally is that it is not your place to jump on the &#8216;Splainin&#8217; Train and straightsplain/mansplain/whitesplain/etc. away a minority&#8217;s objections to your words or behavior.  If someone objects to something you&#8217;ve said or done, take a step back and try to see it from their perspective.  Apologize for your insensitive slight, reword your comment (or rework your thinking) and approach the situation with a little humility.</p>
<p>Also, the concept of deserving reward or praise simply for not being an active bigot is ridiculous.  Behavior deserves praise if it is beyond what can be normally expected.  Do you really want to live in a world where hatred and bigotry are the accepted norms?  Because you can&#8217;t challenge that ugliness without first deciding that humans should hold themselves to higher standards, such as demonstrating compassion, understanding, and respect.  Those are basic tenets of humanity, and we shouldn&#8217;t have to fawn over you for possessing them.</p>
<p>Being active in feminist circles, I hear my fair share of <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/thusspakezuska/2010/01/you_may_be_a_mansplainer_if.php">mansplaining</a>.  They &#8216;splain to me how rape isn&#8217;t that serious of an epidemic, and it is in fact the insidious invasion of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#False_reporting">false rape reports</a> we should be worried about.  They &#8216;splain how sometimes we ladies <a href="http://www.care2.com/causes/british.html">deserve physical punishment</a>, and men really can&#8217;t be blamed for rising to the occasion.  And let&#8217;s not forget that <a href="http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2008/05/10/men-are-more-oppressed-than-women.aspx">they&#8217;re really the oppressed ones</a>, anyway, so we just need to aim a fire extinguisher at our bras and calm down already.</p>
<p>Even male allies can fall into these traps, and it leaves a feminist woman walking the delicate line of not alienating someone who could potentially help the cause, and not stroking the ego of someone who still doesn&#8217;t get it.  An ally who perpetuates harmful stereotypes isn&#8217;t helping the overall movement, and it is that ally&#8217;s responsibility to react calmly and with self-reflection when called out for a misstep.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve <a href="http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/weve_been_violated_enough/">mentioned before</a>, sometimes the most important thing you have to do, as someone not on the receiving end of bigotry, is simply shut the fuck up.  Marginalized people are not trying to oppress you by demanding your occasional silence&#8211;we&#8217;re just asking for a level playing field.  In a world that never stops you from having a say, we&#8217;re asking that you not drown out our voices.  And please, don&#8217;t tell us why we don&#8217;t understand our own oppression; while you were busy observing our lifestyles, we were busy <i>living our lives</i>, having legitimate applicable experiences that you do not have the right to &#8216;splain away.  So sit down a moment, have a cup of tea, and relax while we take the helm of our own movements.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/bunnika.wordpress.com/113/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=bunnika.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21523073&amp;post=113&amp;subd=bunnika&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bunnika.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/youve-got-some-splaining-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bafdf1a7d3953231f23ea5f6236795f6?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bunnika</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb373/respectallfearbun/rainbowcookies.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
